People v. Barkdoll
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendant was indicted for and convicted of having unlawfully sold, furnished, and distributed alcoholic liquor to one William Prey within the boundaries of the third supervisor district of Mendocino County, the same being no-license territory. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Counsel for appellant present three questions for review: 1. That the court erred in not granting defendant’s motion, made, at the close of the people’s evidence, to instruct the jury to acquit; 2. That the court erred in not permitting defendant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Title Insurance Etc. Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. CowgillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. BraistedColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaggartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. MakovskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.