Teledyne McCormick Selph v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sues the United States for patent infringement, within our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1498. The case is before us on exceptions by both parties to the recommended decision submitted by Trial Judge Colaianni under Rule 134(h). The trial judge concluded not only that plaintiffs patent was not infringed, but also that the patent withstood defendant’s various challenges to its validity. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument of counsel, we agree with the trial judge’s conclusion of noninfringement, and adopt his opinion and findings of fact and conclusion of law to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Strumskis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- P.M. Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Fonar Corporation and Dr. Raymond Damadian, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson and Technicare Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.