Fonar Corporation and Dr. Raymond Damadian, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson and Technicare Corporation, Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 630 F.Supp. 581, 230 USPQ 105 (1986) (Keeton, J.). In Appeal No. 86-1005, Fonar Corporation and Dr. Raymond Damadian (collectively Fonar) (1) appeal from an order granting a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and holding that defendants Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Technicare Corporation (collectively J & J) have not infringed or induced infringement of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 3,789,-832, and (2) seek a new trial on the issues of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Railroad Dynamics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. A. Stucki Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.