State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Thornburg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
The questions presented on this appeal are: (1) whether the Commission erred as a matter of law by authorizing a utility to amortize cancellation costs as operating expenses for ratemaking purposes; and (2) whether the Commission’s treatment of cancellation costs in prior orders is res judicata as to issue one. We answer both issues in the negative and affirm the Commission’s order.
I
This is an appeal from an order of the Commission in a general rate case involving Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L). CP&L is a public utility organized and existing under the laws of North…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abels v. Renfro Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- STATE EX REL. UTIL. COM'N v. ThornburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Dennis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission & Carolina Trace Corp. v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.