Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. UTIL. COM'N v. Thornburg

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1989No. 57A88PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

385 S.E.2d 451 (1989)

325 N.C. 463

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION; and Carolina Power and Light Company; Carolina Industrial Group for Fair Utility Rates; Carolina Utility Customers Association, Inc.; United States Department of Defense; Conservation Council of North Carolina; and Elizabeth Anne Cullington

v.

Lacy H. THORNBURG, Attorney General (Appellant).

No. 57A88.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 1989.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Jo Anne Sanford, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Karen E. Long and Lemuel W. Hinton, Asst. Attys. Gen., Raleigh, for State.

Richard E.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peacock v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API