Legal Opinion
Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 8, 2001No. CIV. 00-183-P-CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eileen Crowley’s two-count Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant L.L. Bean Inc. discriminated against her in violation of her rights under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 et seq. (Count I) and the Maine Human Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A § 4572 (Count II). See Amended Complaint (Docket No. 2). Specifically, Crowley asserts that L.L. Bean failed to take reasonable steps to eliminate or prevent the continuous sexual harassment she endured from a coworker. As a consequence of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Greenier v. PACE, LOCAL NO. 1188District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Division of Florida Highway PatrolDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Pouliot v. Town of FairfieldDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Frank v. L.L. Bean Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.