Legal Opinion

Frank v. L.L. Bean Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 23, 2005No. 04-CV-221-P-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND FOR SANCTIONS

SINGAL, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant L.L. Bean’s Motion to Disqualify and for Sanctions (Docket # 15). Defendant argues that Plaintiff violated the Maine Bar Rules and the Local Rules for the District of Maine by conducting an ex parte interview with a former L.L. Bean employee and disclosing confidential settlement information. Defendant requests that the Court impose sanctions against Plaintiff and disqualify Plaintiffs counsel. The Court heard oral argument in this matter on May 5, 2005. For the reasons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Janet Marie Hill v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Armsey v. Medshares Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  3. Bernard v. Galen Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
  5. Davis v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lore v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
  2. Bryant v. Yorktowne Cabinetry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API