Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1965No. 40620Published
1Opinion of the Court
398 P.2d 515 (1965)
OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Roy E. DANIEL and Jessie Mae Daniel, husband and wife, and The Bank of Tuttle, Defendants in Error.
No. 40620.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
January 12, 1965.
McKeever, Glasser, McKeever & Conrad, Enid, Pierce, Mock, Duncan, Couch & Hendrickson, Gerald A. Karam, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Purman Wilson, Purcell, for defendants in error.
HALLEY, Chief Justice.
This is a proceeding in condemnation under the power of eminent domain brought by Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, as plaintiff, against Roy E. Daniel and Jessie Mae…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Cushing v. PoteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Grooms v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.