McGee v. Board of Appeal
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Legal background. Under a special zoning enabling act applicable to Boston, St. 1956, c. 665, §§ 2 et seq., as amended by St. 1993, c. 461, §§ 2 et seq. (the Boston act), the Boston zoning commission adopted the code. See Emerson College v. Boston, 393 Mass. 303, 304-306 (1984). Section 9 of the Boston act authorizes the board to grant variances. Section 11 allows a party aggrieved by a decision of the board to obtain judicial review. These provisions much resemble analogous sections in G. L. c. 40A, the zoning act applicable generally to cities and towns in the Commonwealth. We therefore…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- City Council of Waltham v. VinciulloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Marotta v. Board of Appeals of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldberg v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Dwyer v. GalloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Choate v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Epstein v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Sheppard v. Zoning Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.