Dowling v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
1. The motion of the United States to dismiss the writ of error for lack of any bill of exceptions must be denied, because errors are assigned as to matters shown by the reeord as it is.
2. The motion of the defendants below (plaintiffs in error here) to reverse because of the impossibility of settling a proper bill of exceptions and the errors assigned upon the trial court’s denial of the motion for a new trial, whieh motion was based on the same impossibility, raise the same question. The ease below was a prosecution for conspiracy to possess, transport, and sell…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Leonard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Dowling v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Huth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eugene P. Murphy and the Travelers Insurance Company v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- A. D. Herring v. Kennedy-Herring Hardware Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Focus 15, LLC v. NICO CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022