Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellants have moved that the case be remanded to the District Court, and that a new trial be granted by reason of the failure of the former official court reporter to have fully transcribed the testimony.
It appears that the reporter has left the employment of the court and has not proceeded with the preparation of a transcript. Appellants’ attorney stated during the hearing that he has made repeated attempts to have the reporter complete the work, but has been unsuccessful. It does not appear from the record that appellants have formally requested relief from the District Court.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- A. D. Herring v. Kennedy-Herring Hardware Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Dowling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Julie Thomas v. Computax CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Robert H. Herndon v. The City of MassillonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Bradley v. Hazard Technology Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Lichter v. County of MonmouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- In The Matter Of Lanceford C. BjellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.