Legal Opinion

Huth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1924No. 3828PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The three plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted, along with Hawkins and Sweasy, upon an indictment containing four counts. Counts 1 and 2 charged conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138¼ et seq.) by (count 1) transporting and (count 2) possessing intoxicating liquor. The others charged the substantive offense of (count 3) transporting and (count 4) possessing intoxicating liquor. The three plaintiffs in error were convicted on all four counts; the remaining two, upon counts 3 and 4 only. These two paid the fines imposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. National Prohibition CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Albert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Selzman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Leonard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  4. Middleton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Keith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API