Legal Opinion

Leonard v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1927No. 4688PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The chief question presented is as to the sufficiency of the information. The first count is typical. It is as follows:

“Be it remembered that George O. Taylor, attorney for the United States for the Southern division of the Eastern district of Tennessee, who for the United States, in its behalf, prosecutes in his own person, comes here into the District Court of the said United States for the district and division aforesaid, on this - in this term, leave of the court first being had and obtained, and for the United States gives the court here to understand and be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Butzman v. United States. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Kitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Blum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Fleisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API