Petoskey v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Upon hearing defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ bill of complaint, the trial court permitted plaintiffs to amend. Thereafter defendant renewed its motion to dismiss. It was heard and granted on the ground that the amended bill of complaint did not state a cause of action. Plaintiffs have appealed. They seek relief because of two acts of defendant. One was that the foreclosure sale by defendant of plaintiffs’ mortgaged property was as two separate parcels whereas plaintiffs, possessing the rights of the mortgagors, claim it was only one parcel and should have been so sold. The other was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keyes v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Butts v. RuthvenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Jerome v. CoffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Shelby Co. v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Masella v. BissonMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Lyford v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1946