Legal Opinion

Lyford v. Foster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1946No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 42,997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Upon the application of defendant Lisa Foster, also known as Mrs. J. B. Foster, leave to appeal was allowed from an prder of the circuit court, striking from defendants’ answer a paragraph-designated as an “affirmative defense.”

Plaintiffs C. H. Lyford and Alice Lyford brought an action for damages under the provisions of the Federal emergency price control act of 1942, 56 Stat. at L. 23, as amended, 58 Stat. at L. 640 (50 USCA, § 901 et seq.). Section 205 (e) of this statute, 50 USCA, § 925 (e), provides in part:

“If any person selling a commodity violates a regulation, order, or price…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaincott v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Spelman v. AddisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Eames v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Meyers v. Jay-Bee Realty Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Petoskey v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keenan v. GOEBEL BREWING COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API