Legal Opinion

Eargle v. Horry County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 2001No. 25275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*451PLEICONES, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Eargle v. Horry County, 335 S.C. 425, 517 S.E.2d 3 (Ct.App.1999), wherein that court affirmed the trial court’s determination that South Carolina law does not authorize a county administrator to suspend employees of elected officials. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees, remanding for a determination whether the county was substantially justified in pressing its claim. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This dispute arose after Lois Eargle, (“the Auditor”) the elected…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. City of Columbia v. Pic-A-Flick Video, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Eargle v. Horry CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County AssessorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Angus v. Burroughs & Chapin Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Foothills Brewing Concern, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Corbin v. CarlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Cornelius v. Oconee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API