Legal Opinion

Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance Facility

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 1995No. 24308PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Chief Justice:

In this declaratory action, Appellant Garris seeks to enjoin the respondents from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant’s designated agent status, under S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-590 (1989), should be revoked.

Garris, a licensed insurance agent, was authorized by the Reinsurance Facility (Facility) to serve as a designated producer. During an audit of appellant’s agency, the Facility found violations of performance standards in the Facility’s Rules of Operation and the designated agent’s contract. The Governing Board issued a Notice of Hearing and Rule to Show…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hyde v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Meredith v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. Bank of Augusta v. Satcher Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Hinson v. Georgia State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Rogers v. State Board of CosmetologyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Adamson v. Richland County School District OneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Eargle v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. McSwain v. Charleston County Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API