Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 1, 1956No. 55-CR-53PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The indictment charges defendant with a violation of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C.AAppendix, § 451 et seq., more particularly with failing to remain at civilian work contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety or interest for a period of twenty-four consecutive months.

The defendant claimed that he was innocent of any such violation for three reasons: (1) that his Draft Board had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in failing to classify him as a minister; (2) that it was the duty of said Board to reopen and consider…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. MinkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. Wilbur Leroy RansomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. MonteeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Application of Stuart M. Kanas, by Matthew Kanas, His Father, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Major General T. R. Yancey, Commanding Officer, Fort Hamilton, Brooklyn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Kenneth Paul Yeoman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Magaro v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. BallDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API