Legal Opinion
United States v. Minker
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 16, 1956No. 35PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
Because of conflicting constructions by the Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits of § 235 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 198, we brought these cases here. 349 U. S. 904; 349 U. S. 927. They were heard in sequence, and, since minor differences in their facts are irrelevant to the problems now before us, they may be disposed of in one opinion.
Section 235 (a) 1 provides that any immigration officer “shall have power to require by subpena the attendance *181and testimony of witnesses before immigration officers . . . relating to the privilege of any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- L. Xia v. Rex TillersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.