Legal Opinion

Riley v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1939No. Appeals, 76 and 77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Defendant appeals from judgments on verdicts for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a guest in an automobile which got out of control in consequence of the condition of the highway maintained by defendant. The single complaint is that the learned court below declined to rule plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence.

The measure of care exercisable by a guest in an automobile has been considered and stated so recently * that it is unnecessary now to consider it at length. The evidence would have justified the jury in finding the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Landy v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Schlossstein Et Ux. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siegfried v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Harris v. E. Oostdyk Motor Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bynon v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. DeHaas v. DeHaasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Com. v. MacColl, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API