Legal Opinion
Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 20, 1998No. 4:96CV1095 CDPPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 F.Supp.2d 980 (1998)
Charles E. EMMENEGGER, Robert F. Ritzie, and James E. Riley, Plaintiffs,
v.
BULL MOOSE TUBE COMPANY, Caparo, Inc., Bull Moose Tube, Ltd., and Swraj Paul, Defendants.
No. 4:96CV1095 CDP.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
July 20, 1998.
David W. Harlan, Partner, Melanie R. King, Gallop and Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs.
James R. Dankenbring, Partner, Francis E. Pennington, III, Partner, Thomas W. Jerry, Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, MO, for defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PERRY, District Judge.
This matter is before…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles E. Emmenegger Robert F. Ritzie James E. Riley v. Bull Moose Tube Company Caparo, Inc. Bull Moose Tube, Ltd. Swraj PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
- Charles Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
- (SS) Green v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.