Legal Opinion

Charles Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2003No. 02-2088, 02-2089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Bull Moose Tube Company; Caparo, Inc.; and Bull Moose Tube, Ltd. (collectively, the Company), appeal from the judgment entered by the District Court 1 on a jury verdict in favor of Charles E. Emmenegger and Robert F. Ritzie on their claims for compensation related to a phantom-stock plan. The Company also appeals from the court’s prejudgment interest award. Emmenegger, Ritzie, and James E. Riley cross appeal from the order awarding the Company partial cost of the supersedeas bond that the Company was required to post on the first appeal of this case. We affirm.

This is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
Calvin Berthelsen v. Maurice KaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
Gerald W. Kerr v. Charles F. Vatterott & Co. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N. A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003