Legal Opinion
Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 15, 1995No. 94-2283PublishedCited by 287 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Theodore M. Barbour sued his former employer, Dynamics Research Corporation (“DRC”), claiming that DRC terminated his employment to avoid paying disability benefits, in violation of section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. The district court granted summary judgment for DRC, and we affirm.
/.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In July 1985, DRC, an Andover, Massachusetts company, hired Barbour as a staff engineer. Although Barbour was performing his job satisfactorily, his supervisor, Earl Zimmerman, began to complain to Barbour in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by287 opinions
- Etim U. AKA v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Wojcik v. Massachusettts State Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Borschow Hospital & Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Cesar Castillo Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unión Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos Y AlcantarilladosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.