Legal Opinion

Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 12, 1998No. 4:96CV1095 CDPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

33 F.Supp.2d 1123 (1998)

Charles E. EMMENEGGER, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

BULL MOOSE TUBE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

No. 4:96CV1095 CDP.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

November 12, 1998.

David W. Harlan, Partner, Melanie R. King, Gallop and Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for Charles E. Emmenegger, Robert F. Ritzie, James E. Riley.

James R. Dankenbring, Partner, Francis E. Pennington, III, Partner, Thomas W. Jerry, Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, MO, for Bull Moose Tube Company, Caparo, Inc., Bull Moose Tube, Ltd., Swraj Paul.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PERRY,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Bernice v. Mansker, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Mansker, Deceased v. Tmg Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. v. CassityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API