Legal Opinion
X-Men Security, Inc. v. Pataki
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1997No. 96 Cv. 5041PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
SUMMARY
This civil rights case arises from the termination of a contract held by X-Men Security, Inc. (“X-Men”) to provide security guard services to a housing development in Brooklyn, New York known as Ocean Towers. The plaintiffs are X-Men, its owner Anthony Richards and Sheila Boyd, a tenant of Ocean Towers. The defendants fall into three groups: those in the private sector (“the Private Defendants”); those who, at the time of the events alleged, held official positions in the government of the State of New York, (“the State Defendants”); and a…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Locurto v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Barrington Cove Ltd. Partnership v. Rhode Island Housing & Mortgage Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- X-Men Security, Inc. v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. County of Nassau, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Riley v. Town of BethlehemDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.