Legal Opinion
X-Men Security, Inc. v. Pataki
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 2, 1999No. Docket Nos. 97-9023(L), 97-9595(CON)PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Jules Polonetsky, a former member of the New York State Assembly, and Peter King, a member of the United States House of Representatives (collectively the “legislators”), appeal from or*60ders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, I. Leo Glasser, Judge, denying their motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss, on qualified-immunity grounds, the claims of plaintiffs X-Men Security, Inc., and its principal owner Anthony Richards (collectively “X-Men”) under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1994), alleging invidiously…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Anderson News, L.L.C. v. American Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Martinez v. SimonettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Velez v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Kerman v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Velez v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.