Legal Opinion

United States v. Gore

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 29, 2003No. NMCM 200300348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Senior Judge:

The case before this court is an interlocutory appeal by the Government, pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 and Rule for Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2002 ed.). The Government contends that the military judge erred as a matter of law when he: (1) concluded that the convening authority unlawfully influenced the court-martial proceedings; and (2) dismissed all charges and specifications with prejudice. We hold that the military judge did not err in his conclusion, but did err in his choice of remedy.

Proce…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. BiagaseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. StombaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. RatliffNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API