Legal Opinion

United States v. Ratliff

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 23, 2007No. NMCCA 200700512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

O’TOOLE, Judge:

This ease is before us on an interlocutory appeal by the Government, pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule for Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.). The Government contends the military judge erred as a matter of law when he dismissed the charge and its two specifications, concluding: (1) that the 2003 and 2006 amendments to Article 43, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 843, which extended the statute of limitations for child abuse offenses, did not apply to offenses alleged to have…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  5. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ChristopherNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API