United States v. Ratliff
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT
O’TOOLE, Judge:
This ease is before us on an interlocutory appeal by the Government, pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule for Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.). The Government contends the military judge erred as a matter of law when he dismissed the charge and its two specifications, concluding: (1) that the 2003 and 2006 amendments to Article 43, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 843, which extended the statute of limitations for child abuse offenses, did not apply to offenses alleged to have…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ChristopherNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017