Legal Opinion
DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Walter B. Tolub, J.
In June 1999, plaintiff, Mark A. DiCintio, leased a 1999 Jeep Grand Laredo, manufactured by defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation (Chrysler), from defendant Adzam Auto Sales, Inc. (Adzam) for a monthly payment of nearly $400. Plaintiff received several written warranties, including a three-year or 36,000-mile warranty. Title to the vehicle did not pass to plaintiff. At the conclusion of the three-year lease term, *669plaintiff had. the option to purchase the vehicle for its projected residual value.
Plaintiff commenced the instant action against defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schiavone v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Freeman v. Hubco Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. PSI Cosmetics, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Business Modeling Techniques, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Waldman v. New Chapter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Dekelaita v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Dekelaita v. Nissan Motor Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003