Legal Opinion
Ratliff v. Akron City
Summit County Court of Common Pleas
Decided March 17, 1959No. 209695PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WATTERS, J.
The petition was filed against Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company and the City of Akron. In the meantime said defendant company has been dismissed, and the case came on for trial upon the original petition, but against the City only. The petition originally charged joint and concurrent negligence.
The defendant, City of Akron, before opening statement moved for judgment on the pleadings.
Plaintiff, in substance, eliminating the former defendant company, charges that the defendant, City of Akron, on and prior to November 15, 1956, owned and operated the Akron Sewage Disposal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Hutchinson v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Salem v. HardingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Norwood v. Sheen, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Hack v. City of SalemOhio Supreme Court · 1963