Legal Opinion

City of Norwood v. Sheen, Exr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1932No. 3982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

The disposal of sewage is a governmental function. City of Mansfield v Balliett, 65 Oh St, 451.

There is no question but that the act of the City of Norwood in permitting the sewage to flow over and upon the plaintiff’s property constituted an appropriation of property to that extent. In the case of Schneider v Brown et Commissioners, etc, 33 Oh Ap, 269, it was held that the temporary use of property was an appropriation for that purpose. So in the case at bar, the using of the property for the disposal of sewage was an appropriation to that extent of the property.

The City also claims that the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bluhm v. Blanck & Gargaro, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Dowling v. Dayton Union Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Ratliff v. Akron CitySummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API