Legal Opinion

MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. v. Frazer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 8, 2011No. 26859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

Matthew Kundinger (Appellant) enrolled a default judgment against Louis and Linda Frazer (the Frazers) before the Frazers closed a refinance mortgage with Matrix Financial Services Corporation (Matrix). In Matrix’s foreclosure action, the master-in-equity granted Matrix equitable subrogation, giving the refinance mortgage priority over Appellant’s judgment lien. We certified the case pursuant to Rule 204(b), *136SCACR, and reversed in Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. Frazer, No. 26859, 2010 WL 3219472 (S.C.Sup.Ct. Aug.16, 2010). This Court granted a petition for rehearing and we now withdraw…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Dedes v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Dodge City of Spartanburg, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Inglese v. BealCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Bac Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. KinderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Boone v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Independence National Bank v. Buncombe Professional Park, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Crawford v. Central Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API