Legal Opinion

In Re the Claim of Valvo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1982PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

In these three cases recipients of unemployment insurance failed to report that they had performed occasional services of a business nature for friends or family members during periods of claimed unemployment. The agency found that these services constituted employment, that claimants had therefore made false statements of unemployment and that the statements were wilfully made. In each case a penalty was imposed and the claimants were also directed to repay the benefits received.

On three separate appeals the Appellate Division, Third Department, modified by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SmaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In Re the Claims of MaguireNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In re Cam-Ful Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re the Claim of BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. In re the Claim of O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API