Legal Opinion

Fox Rig Co. v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1928No. 17471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is an action by the Pox Rig Company against Claude Bell, Hudson-Houston Lumber Company, Continental Supply Company, and others, to foreclose a materialman’s lien. It appears from the evidence that the defendant Claude Bell is the owner of an oil and gas lease in section 31, twp. 2 S., range 2 west, Carter county, Okla In December, 1922, he started drilling thereon. The plaintiff furnished material to the amount of $2,500 for the purpose of building a rig, and the defendant Hudson-Plouston Lumber Company furnished material in the sum of $306.70 for the purpose of erecting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherbondy v. Tulsa Boiler & MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Joplin Sash & Door Works v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Mid-Co Pipe & Supply Co. v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Republic Supply Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Oklahoma Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. In Re RhineDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  3. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Standard Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Georgia State Savings Ass'n v. Sun Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Continental Supply Co. v. Geo. H. Greenan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API