Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cook

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1927No. 18176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Mayes county. The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below.

Plaintiff in error in due time served and filed its briefs in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendants in error has wholly failed to file any brief or otherwise appear in this court, nor have they offered any excuse for their failure to do so.

“Where the plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, thic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Clark v. Oklahoma Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Fox Rig Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Cushing Country Club v. Boardman CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. DormireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API