Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Jewett Rhodes Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1938No. Civ. 6088PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Plaintiff was a passenger in a ear owned and operated by Wm. II. Jewett, who was then about the business of defendant Jewett Rhodes Motor Company, a eor poration. The ear, due to negligent operation by Jewett, left the highway, injuring plaintiff.
An action was brought by Ellis against Jewett and the Motor Company. On the first trial a jury found for defendants. A new trial was granted which was affirmed by this court (Ellis v. Jewett, etc., 18 Cal. App. (2d) 629 [64 Pac. (2d) 432]), where may also be found a recital of the facts surrounding this accident. Upon a seeoncl trial the jury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Thompson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Plath v. JustusNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Holcomb v. FlavinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Boyer v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.