Legal Opinion

Hecht v. Hecht

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1968No. Civ. 30799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

The parties hereto being unable to consummate a property settlement during the pendency of their divorce action, entered into a stipulation approved by the court on September 7, 1960, for support of their children, respondent-wife, and otherwise affecting but not completing a disposition of their property rights.

On July 11, 1961, an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted to respondent-wife which, among other things, reserved to the court for its determination the issues of alimony, child support, the division of community property of the parties, attorneys ’ fees, etc.

A final judgment of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. RasmussenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Tremayne v. StriepekeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Corrie v. CorrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API