Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Rasmussen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1969No. Civ. 25063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATTIGAN,

These appeals involve the enforceability, by execution upon a former husband’s earnings, of the provisions of a decree of divorce ordering him to make support payments to his former wife pursuant to a property settlement agreement incorporated in the decree. We hold that, because the property settlement agreement was integrated in character as previously adjudicated in this action, the former husband’s earnings are exempt from execution.

The pertinent facts and the procedural sequence below, as set forth in an agreed statement on appeal and exhibits thereto (rule 6, Cal. Rules of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Plumer v. PlumerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rabkin v. RabkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Wodicka v. WodickaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Roosevelt v. RooseveltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Mandanis v. MandanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Mandanis v. MandanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API