Legal Opinion
Gerardo v. Gerardo
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1952No. Civ. 4454PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff husband filed an action for divorce against defendant wife, alleging cruelty. He particularly alleged that there was no community property and so testified at the hearing. After an amendment by interlineation by the court, as hereinafter indicated, the complaint recited that the minor child, aged about two years,
“. . . is now in the custody of the defendant and: that is and view e# the tender age ef said child, it appears to be for be placed his best interest and welfare to remáis in the custody of plaintiff defendant defendant for the time being, subject to the right of plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Darsie v. DarsieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Ex parte GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stack v. WelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Knox v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Jackson v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Belmont v. BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961