Legal Opinion

McGoldrick v. Datatrak International, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1999No. CIV97-2306 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, it is—

ORDERED:

1. That the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10] is granted in part.

2. That Count IV is dismissed with prejudice.

3.That the Motion for Summary Judgment is denied in all other respects.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barbara McLaughlin v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Liebe v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Elsie Marie Mayard v. Tamara Joy Hopwood Kernie Beam Miller Terry Hyde, Dennis Meyer John Wright Karsten WingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Guercio v. Production Automation Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Collison v. Wandrd, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API