Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Scheibel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 16, 1989No. 631, Docket 88-1255PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Ronald Scheibel appeals from his conviction in the District of Connecticut for possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1982). Scheibel claims that he was prejudiced by the district court’s admission of allegedly false exculpatory evidence that was not sufficiently connected to him. Scheibel also claims that the district court erred in the limiting instructions and charge to the jury concerning the challenged evidence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
At approximately 10:00 a.m. on December 27, 1986, Scheibel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Milton Parness and Barbara ParnessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Raymond JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Sally Di Stefano and Linda Di StefanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Daniel Lee Rucker and Eugene C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Calvin MacKlin Jr. And Arthur Garfield SwainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Barry RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard T. StrotherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John J. CasseseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Quartararo v. HanslmaierDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.