Legal Opinion
Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 23, 1928No. 26,905PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action in equity to set aside an agreement or stipulation of settlement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants. A de murrer was sustained to the complaint, and the plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff, Frederickson, was injured while in the employ of the defendant Burns Lumber Company. He was denied compensation by the industrial commission. On review we held him entitled to compensation and the case was remanded to the commission. Frederickson v. Burns Lbr. Co. 163 Minn. 394, 204 N. W. 161. Upon its return to the commission there was a disagreement as to the proper procedure. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Van Blaricom v. Export Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Foley v. Western Alloyed Steel Casting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.