Legal Opinion

Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1926No. 25,163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

For the second time this proceeding is before us on certiorari to the Industrial Commission, the former opinion appearing in 163 Minn. 394, 204 N. W. 161. For the reasons stated there we remanded the proceeding for rehearing on the merits. That took it back, not to the referee for a trial de novo, but to the Industrial Commission. There was no necessity for receiving again the evidence already in. But counsel for relator insisted at the outset upon a trial de novo. He was advised that the commission would not listen again to the old evidence, hut that it would consider an application to take…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Simpson v. GoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API