Florance v. Buchmeyer
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING AND SUPPLEMENTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge.
After reviewing the Plaintiffs objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Find ings and Conclusions of the Court. The Court notes that the cite in footnote 2 should be — U.S. -,…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- Blakely v. AndradeDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Gilchrist v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
- Kostic v. Texas A & M University at CommerceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Johnson v. ChampionsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.