Legal Opinion
Celotex Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 1, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the-Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, dismissing the opposition and adjudging that’ the applicant was entitled to the registration of. its trade-mark.
The trade-mark of opposer is “Celotex” and the trade-mark of the applicant is “Mametex.” Both, marks are applied to wall hoard.
The Celotex Company was organized in 1920 and began the manufacture of .wall board known as “Celotex” in 1921 and has increased its production from 18,000,000 square feet in 1922 to approximately 500,-000,000 square…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Decker & Cohn, Inc. v. S. Liebovitz Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Apex Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard Hellmann, Inc. v. Oakford & FahnestockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- E. Daltroff & Cie v. Vivaudou, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932