Seidler v. Goodspeed
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Appellants Ben Seidler and Grace Seidler have appealed from that portion of the order settling final account and decree of distribution under will of decedent distributing to Nina Goodspeed certain real property which appellants contend was devised to them by the will.
The provision of decedent’s will which gave rise to the controversy reads as follows: “Third: I hereby give, devise and bequeath to the following named persons, the following described personal property and the sums of money set after their names . . . B. To Ben Seidler and Mrs. Grace Seidler of 1216 East Eighth Street, Long…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Estate of BournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hansen v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Schuster v. SchusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.