Legal Opinion

McMahan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1960No. A-12771PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIX, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred, to as the defendant, was charged by information in the District Court of Kay County with the crime of embezzlement. He was-tried before a jury, was found guilty by the following verdict returned by the jury;-

“We the jury empanelled and sworn to try the issues in the above entitled cause, do, upon our oaths, find the defendant guilty, but unable to agree-on the punishment and leave the pun-’ ishment to the court. However, we recommend leniency do to circumstances.”

The jury being unable to agree upon the-punishment, defendant was sentenced…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Nickels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Turman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Valenti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Cothrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API