State v. Magnuson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURCH, Circuit Judge.
Defendant was convicted upon information charging forgery in the third degree, in substance as follows: That in Bon Homme county, S. D., on the 20th day of January, 1920, the defendant sold and delivered to Emmanuel Kielbauch a certain forged and counterfeit note, knowing the same to be forged and counterfeit, with intent to have said forged and counterfeit note uttered and passed as a true and genuine note. The defendant pleaded “not guilty,” and former acquittal. This appeal is from an order overruling a motion for new trial.
George M. Caster, a licensed and practicing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- People v. . MarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Biemel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- State v. BurttsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.