Legal Opinion

State v. Magnuson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1925No. File No. 5181PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURCH, Circuit Judge.

Defendant was convicted upon information charging forgery in the third degree, in substance as follows: That in Bon Homme county, S. D., on the 20th day of January, 1920, the defendant sold and delivered to Emmanuel Kielbauch a certain forged and counterfeit note, knowing the same to be forged and counterfeit, with intent to have said forged and counterfeit note uttered and passed as a true and genuine note. The defendant pleaded “not guilty,” and former acquittal. This appeal is from an order overruling a motion for new trial.

George M. Caster, a licensed and practicing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. People v. . MarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Biemel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. State v. BurttsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API