Legal Opinion

Merkley v. Beaslin

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 26, 1989No. 880191-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARFF, Judge:

Plaintiff/appellant, J. Ray Merkley, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his malpractice action against defendant/respondent, John C. Beaslin. The trial court concluded that if respondent committed any legal malpractice, it occurred in 1976 when respondent drafted legal documents for the sale of a business for appellant, and, therefore, that Merkley’s action by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

We recite only the pertinent facts. In 1975, respondent, an attorney licensed to practice law in Utah, assisted appellant in setting up a recreational vehicle…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Aragon v. Clover Club Foods Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API