Legal Opinion
Marchisheck v. San Mateo County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1999No. 98-16141PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12945.1 to .2, 19702.3. Plaintiff Fe Castro Marchisheck contends that defendant San Mateo County violated those statutes when it terminated her employment after she took a one-month unauthorized leave from work to move her teenage son to the Philippines. The district court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On de novo review, see Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998), we affirm.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Katherine L. Price v. City of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Sims v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
3Cited by42 opinions
- Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- James Hansen v. Fincantieri Marine Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Stephane Moreau v. Air France Joseph P. Bouloux Howard Weisser v. United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.